jump to navigation

Corgan’s bandmates contribute by keeping up, not by reining him in 10:23 pm // Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Posted by jjb in analysis, band, criticism, mellon collie, oceania, thefutureembrace.
trackback

Among the most tired canards found in criticism of the Smashing Pumpkins is that Billy Corgan’s work has been much better at those times when his vision was actively constrained by his collaborators.

A metaphor often used to illustrate Corgan’s supposed position has been that of a horse beneath a rider, and (as predicted) that metaphor has been trotted out in reviews of the Pumpkins’ new album Oceania. Spin Magazine’s Rob Harvilla used it today:

And so when it’s time for the nine-minute, multi-suite title track that gets way out of hand, these young bucks at the very least keep up, rein Corgan in, keep him honest.

Yes, it can plausibly be argued that Corgan’s music has been better when other hands are very involved; if you don’t love his solo record TheFutureEmbrace but hold dear the Pumpkins canon, that’s a ready conclusion to reach. But this is probably the case because Corgan is, or at least feels, freer to explore and go crazy when he’s in a band setting: His bandmates improve the music not by burying him in noes but by, to borrow Harvilla’s other phrase there, keeping up—not in the saddle but alongside Corgan, enabling him to divide labor and achieve wilder visions. What, after all, are the attributes we ascribe to the band’s reputed best work? Harvilla lists a few himself:

Prime Smashing Pumpkins reveled in the alleged worst aspects of the ’70s (the excess, the prog, the squeedly-deedly-doo guitar solos) and has nonetheless aged splendidly: Siamese Dream is a shitload less dated than, say, Ten; and Mellon Collie, for all its blatant absurdity, is an astoundingly deep, committed, multifaceted, entrancing clusterfuck that is way closer to being the best record of the grunge era than any of us should be comfortable with.

The next time someone says that TheFutureEmbrace reveled in excess will be the first; as was fairly apparent, Corgan imposed some tight constraints upon its recording, such as a limitation to only one guitar track per song. That record aside, the other major output from Corgan’s interstitial solo period was…a batch of exclusively acoustic music. And we are supposed to believe that James Iha, D’Arcy Wretzky, and Jimmy Chamberlin’s contributions to Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness and Siamese Dream are best characterized in terms of placed restraints? When Corgan talks about Butch Vig’s influence on Gish, he doesn’t speak of boundaries—he says that Vig was the only one who could stay up with him, while everyone else had gone home.

Harvilla is smart, and his review of Oceania is mostly on point. But it does suffer, pardon that expression, from pomposity a lack of self-awareness. Harvilla goes on for 1,200 words, the writing is showy as a public fuck…and it’s fine; the piece is entertainingly expressive, and a hardass editor cutting out modifiers would probably kill the major joys therein to be had. This here is to urge the guy forward, not to choke him back into an amble: Rob, write on.

Comments

1. apm - 11:06 pm // Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Oh darn, I congratulated Harvilla for the first Internet mention of Tila Tequila since 2009 but they apparently deleted my comment as non-constructive. Oh well.

2. gsmamz - 11:19 pm // Tuesday, June 26, 2012

“Rob, write on.” Hahahahahaha.

3. mybestfriendstew - 11:39 pm // Tuesday, June 26, 2012

hit the nail on the head with this one

4. gsmamz - 11:39 pm // Tuesday, June 26, 2012

“…the corny vow, “I’m gonna love you / 101 percent,” which any decent college football coach will insist is at least nine percent short. I admit I got a kick out of that.

Add this reviewer to the never-ending pile of writers who lazily misspell Jimmy’s name as “Chamberlain”. Ughh.

5. loser - 12:22 am // Wednesday, June 27, 2012

a little off topic but the pitchdork review states that pale horse shares the same chord progression as thru the eyes of ruby, those two tracks could not be any different

6. Randelius - 12:46 am // Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Not that far off topic(although we did discuss this last week)– something is going on where a lot of these reviewers are copying each other, b/c this is the second review to compare Quasar to Cherub Rock (when it is clearly more of a Superchrist-tinted Gish track as has been roundly agreed upon around here) and to compare The Celestials to Disarm. (?) Granted, this guy didn’t go so far as to call The Celestials a “Disarm redux,” but it’s weird either way (especially the jackass last week who called Oceania a Starla ripoff – wtf?? And the less-noticeable gaff that said One Diamond One Heart nods to Adore when it clearly does not- if anything it nods to TFE). Taking more than the singles into account, at worst The Celestials is a God & Country do-over, but none of these professional writers will ever say anything too incisive or informed by the SP catalog, since they haven’t listened to B.C. since Adore anyway.

7. gsmamz - 12:55 am // Wednesday, June 27, 2012

I can’t comprehend how anyone could compare Quasar to Cherub Rock, at all, other than the very loose, vague fact that they are both sort of heavy, guitar-driven songs.

8. justsaymaybe - 4:23 am // Wednesday, June 27, 2012

^ well, I think when people make the comparison between Quasar with Cherub Rock they are referring to the drum and volume progression at the beginning of the song. “Hey this sounds like Cherub Rock” was actually the first thought I had of the song because of the beginning drums. I don’t think that there are any legitimate comparisons beyond that. Its not that it actually literally compares to Cherub Rock but that it reminds me of the song because of the intro.

9. Jonk - 5:43 am // Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Yeah a lot of the song comparisons seem lazy to me. How in the world can you compare the Celestials to Disarm

10. zanzabar - 8:44 am // Wednesday, June 27, 2012

i burst out laughing at that “Rob, write on” line

hahaha god that was funny

11. werideatdusk - 9:04 am // Wednesday, June 27, 2012

hilarious article. nice post

12. person of a person - 11:57 am // Wednesday, June 27, 2012

a review of a review.

13. Jill - 4:30 pm // Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Hi, person of a person. You must be new here.

14. Anth - 8:14 pm // Wednesday, June 27, 2012

See, I don’t think that James or D’Arcy ever “reined him in”–in fact, they were probably the most passive people Billy’s ever played with from a purely musical/creative perspective. But I do think there is a connection that the more frustrated Billy is with either his bandmates (Siamese Dream; Mary Star of the Sea) or critics/audiences (Mellon Collie; Oceania), the more inspired he is to create something incredible to prove what he’s capable of. But that said, Oceania is so good that even the unity within the group and the positive critical reception has me really optimistic about the future, which is something I wouldn’t have said a year ago.

(Only in the Pumpkins universe would anyone say that a combination of the band getting along plus good reviews is something to worry about, haha.)

15. Abid - 7:59 pm // Thursday, June 28, 2012

Ahahaha hipstersunited got da punz


Sorry comments are closed for this entry

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 128 other followers

%d bloggers like this: